Rehabilitation, reintegration and managing risk for crime
We design, evaluate and support the delivery of evidence-based practices to assist people to attain crime-free lives.
Research stream leaders: Dr Caleb Lloyd and Professor Michael Daffern
About this research stream
A correctional system is effective when human service is a top priority. Human service includes rehabilitation (programming that targets the reasons people stay involved in crime), reintegration (preparing and assisting people to successfully transition to the community after prison), and management (making well-informed decisions about which people pose risk to others and how to address that risk).
The behavioural sciences are a critical source for the evidence-based approaches that define best practice within corrections. Our team draws on these empirical traditions to design, evaluate and support human service within contemporary corrections.
Relevant projects
- Developing and evaluating new and existing rehabilitation programs
- Evaluating interventions to reduce firesetting recidivism
- Evaluation of the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-entry (DRAOR)
- Developing a comprehensive best-practice training for community corrections staff
- Developing training for correctional staff to recognise criminal thinking
- Psychological change through youth justice group conferencing
- Factors related to desistance from offending among court-involved youth
- Cognitive and emotional changes that support desistance from crime during community supervision
- Therapist perspectives on building therapeutic alliance, including with clients with a history of criminal behaviour
Relevant publications
Stone, A.G., Lloyd, C.D., Spivak, B.L., Papalia, N.L., & Serin, R.C. (2023). Trajectories of change in acute dynamic risk ratings and associated risk for recidivism in paroled New Zealanders: A joint latent class modelling approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-022-09566-5
Coulter, D.J. & Lloyd, C.D. (2023). Using a reassessment framework to determine critical case management needs: DRAOR improves on LS/RNR’s predictive discrimination of short-term recidivism, Psychology, Crime & Law. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2166506
Ogloff, J.R.P., Rose, A., Meyer, D., Benson, S., Shepherd, S.M., Pfeifer, J., Louise, S., Trounson, J., Skues, J., & Daffern, M. (2023). The impact of a short-term mental health intervention delivered in an Australian prison: A multi-cultural comparison. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 22(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2022.2041772
Klepfisz, G., Lloyd, C.D., Day, A., & Daffern, M. (2022). Increasing client motivation ratings across violence rehabilitation are promising predictors of reduced post-custody recidivism. Psychology, Crime & Law. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2108422
Morrison, F.P., Fullam, R., Thomson, K., Meyer, D., & Daffern, M. (2022). Results from a non-randomized pilot study evaluating the impact of a novel group treatment program targeting aggressive script rehearsal and emotion regulation in a sample of incarcerated males. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X221086581
Albrecht, B., Spivak, B., Daffern, M., & McEwan, T.E. (2022). The temporal relationship between mental health service use and stalking perpetration. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 56(12), 1642-1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674211072449
Tyler, N., Gannon, T.A., & Olver, M. (2021). Does treatment for sexual offending work? Current Psychiatry Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-021-01259-3
Batastini, A. B., Miller, O. K., Horton, J., & Morgan, R. D. (2023). Mental health services in restricted housing: Do we know what’s going on behind the steel doors? Psychological Services, 20(3), 576–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000606
Papalia, N., Spivak, B., Daffern, M., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2020). Are psychological treatments for adults with histories of violent offending associated with change in dynamic risk factors? A meta-analysis of intermediate treatment outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(12), 1585–1608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820956377
Papalia, N., Spivak, B., Daffern, M., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2019). A meta‐analytic review of the efficacy of psychological treatments for violent offenders in correctional and forensic mental health settings. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 26(2), Article e12282. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12282
Tyler, N., Gannon, T.A., Lockerbie, L., & Ó Ciardha, C. (2018). The evaluation of a specialist firesetting intervention for mentally disordered offenders: The FIP-MO. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 25(3), 388-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2172
Our research in the news
Victims and people harmed by crime say restorative justice helped them heal, now there are calls to make it more available.
Explore our other research programs
Contact the Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science
There are many ways to engage with us. Whether you’re a student, from the media or an organisation interested in our professional development and training programs or consulting services, contact us on +61 3 9214 3887 or via cfbs@swinburne.edu.au.